Centre for Sciece Developemnet and Media Studies

Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India

National Policy on ICT in School Education
global e-schools and communities initiative
About us . Contact us . Career
 


Sitemap




e-Discussion
Communities in Dialogue @ UN Solution Exchange

 
e-Governance in Higher Education

Rajeev Singh
Oracle India Private Ltd., Block-1, DLF Corporate Park, DLF City Phase – III, Gurgaon
E-mail: rajeev.x.singh@oracle.com, singh.rajeev@gmail.com


Abstract Higher Education in India has seen massive growth in recent years. On one hand, this growth promises to produce more skilled individuals to fulfill needs of ever growing Indian economy and on the other hand it poses a huge challenge for the governing bodies like UGC, AICTE and others to maintain or improve the quality of education. An integrated Higher Education Service System (HESS) at a national level can be one of the key ICT initiatives to help India become a provider of world-class education. This system can provide deep visibility to governing bodies at a university and student level to analyze their performance and hence gear up for future requirements. HESS will enable various stakeholders to leverage the improved operational efficiency in various key processes like grants, utilization certificates, approval processes, feedback mechanism etc. With deeper visibility and increased operational efficiency the Indian Higher Education System would be bolstered not only to satisfy the needs of students by making them more employable but also combat possible competition from foreign universities.

Index Terms – e-governance, Higher Education Service System, Integrated System.

I. INTRODUCTION

India has seen a lot of change in its educational system since independence. The government has shown great commitment in terms of funds for educational sector over many years. These funds have created many world-class institutions like IITs, IIMs etc. but these kinds of institutes are few in number. Pressing need of an emerging India is increased number of high quality institutions/universities.
India has one of the largest Higher Education Systems in the world1. The higher education system, which caters to needs of approximately 99.54 lacs of students, definitely deserves applause for its commendable work so far. Despite having the largest Higher Education System, the quality of education, in general, cannot be claimed to be the best. Providing education to such a massive student base brings with it a number of challenges both at operational and strategic level as described below:

A. Operational Challenges

1. Duplication of procedures

According to a survey conducted by FICCI, most of the promoters of institutions/universities feel that multiplicity of regulating agencies like University Grant Commission (UGC), All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Medical Council of India, Central Council of Indian Medicine, etc. leads to duplication of procedures causing immense loss of time and resources.

Ideally, a single window should exist for approval process. The university/institute should be asked to submit all the documents at once online for approvals. Various regulating agencies should then internally coordinate to fetch the documents/details from that common pool. This would greatly reduce the unnecessary duplication of work for University.

2. Long funding cycles

The approval cycle for funds tends to be long due to verification and various performance analysis of the University being funded. Performance analysis consumes lot of time and resource. In general the time from request for funds to disbursement of funds is approximately seven months.

The difference between time of request for fund and disbursement of fund leaves much to forecasting and guesswork. If this difference can be reduced then the expenditure can be planned better. It will not only improve the utilization rate of grants but also prevent institute from making an unplanned and hasty decision for utilizing the remaining em>amount.

3. Long Approval Processes

There are various accrediting bodies like NAAC, NBA etc. to maintain and improve the quality of education in a University/Institute. These bodies take approximately nine months for the accreditation process to be complete.

The process of approval and accreditation should be faster and preferably paperless for Universities to get the rating quickly. If the process is short then the frequency for accreditation for a University can be more i.e. a university that has been rated ‘A’ in one year can continue to be graded every year or every 2 year hence, keeping itself upto- date with the norms and rules set by governing bodies. This also will help students who seek admission based on rankings/ratings of the colleges.

4. Fraudulent Colleges

Despite a great control of governing bodies in Higher Education, there are many colleges and students who get involved in fraudulent activities. This is a cause of concern various recruiters/other universities. It also is a negative indicator of Indian Higher Education System for various MNCs, present in the country, who take this news back to their countries.

The verification of any college or student’s qualification should be possible from a single source. This would help large Universities/Corporate keep a check on students trying to seek admission/job with forged certificates.

B. Strategic Challenges

1. Deteriorating Quality of Education

India has some of the great Institutes and Universities but the number of employable students is very less. According to NASSCOM, of 3 million graduates and post-graduates added to the workforce in India every year only 25% of technical and 10-15% of non-technical graduates are employable by growing IT and ITES sector.

In today’s environment it is essential for the governing bodies to keep a track of Universities based on monthly basis. There should be a metric to assess the performance of a University on an overall basis and on course basis. Some of the criteria can be the progression of course during a specified period, number of students attending them etc. Based on these metrics the University/College can be asked to explain the reason for good/bad performance. To achieve all this there should be consolidated information about each university/college to track their performance versus grants allocated.

2. Outdated Curriculum

A major issue in Higher Education today is obsolete and irrelevant course curriculum [2]. Today, the demand of industry is far from the learning that a student has gone through. In fast growing economy the preference will always be given to a person who understands the industry practices. Based on this criterion of little practical knowledge, many graduates are losing out on possible job opportunities for various MNCs inside and outside the country.
The need today is to analyze the trend being followed by Institutions of Excellence. Also, by seeing how the students are selecting their courses a trend can be obtained about the movement of preferences among students. This kind of analysis can help governing bodies determine the academic plan and course curriculum for the lesser performing universities.

3. Unemployed Students

It would be a mistake to assume that smaller colleges/ universities would not have bright or employable students. There have been many cases where bright students from lesser-known colleges do not even get an opportunity to showcase his/her potential.

It should be a duty of governing bodies to provide these bright students some opportunities. This can be achieved if industry interaction is improved through a common medium. The governing bodies should provide a common platform for best performing students and industry seeking employees to interact for jobs, projects, research work etc. If a governing body is involved in this process then the industry will see it as a credible platform to recruit.

II. E-GOVERNANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION

ICT has played a major role in reducing operational inefficiency and improving decision-making in many areas of governance. An integrated “Higher Education Service System” is one such concept that can empower the governing bodies to administer the progress of the education plan in the whole country and serve various stakeholders in a much better manner.



Higher Education Service System is conceptualized to be an integrated system having interfaces with all the Universities. The data required for this system will be as following:

A. Inputs required for the system

1. Universities/Colleges

All the Universities and Colleges in India should have an interface with UGC by registering themselves with HESS. Each university will have access to the system, where it would have to furnish the following details on a periodic (quarterly/monthly) basis:
  • Details of fund utilization
  • Details of all the registered students including their grades, attendance etc.
  • Courses offered and curriculum
  • Progress of course on a periodic basis
  • Details of academic/research project where human resource is required
2. Governing Bodies

All the governing bodies including UGC, AICTE, MCI (Medical Council of India) etc. should also be registered with the system (HESS). Each body will have separate access to the system. These bodies will have to furnish following details to the system:
  • Details of fund allocation
  • Details of approval processes for a university/college along with all the required documents
  • List of necessary details required for accreditation.
3. Industry/Corporate Bodies

Governing bodies can empanel some of the organizations selected through a process to become key contributors in providing inputs regarding the latest trends in the industries. This would enable the governing bodies to keep the universities/ colleges in synch with the market needs. Organizations can provide input to the system in terms of:
  • Desired skill set in current scenario
  • Obsolete course contents
  • Details of upcoming projects/employment
These contributions can be made at a common place in the system.

B. Output from Higher Education Service System

1. Consolidated Information for Analysis

HESS will have consolidated information of all the registered universities and their students. It would enable the governing bodies analyze trends and take strategic decision in future. For illustration, in many universities across United States, a system is used to analyze the demographics of students registering with a University45. It helps them analyze the application trend based on geography and demographics e.g. students from which part of the country are not applying to the university and why. Similar analysis can be done in India by governing bodies to see and compare the performances of various Universities based on re- gions. This analysis can then help them in devising a strategy for the overall growth of a region and its population.

Once the data about Universities/Colleges and their students is consolidated, many kinds of analysis can be carried out for the betterment of the education system. Some of the analysis can be:
  • Trend Analysis of Demand: The choice of courses by students is probably the best indicator of changing market needs. This trend can be proactively tracked by the governing bodies and a mechanism can be developed in short time to empower various Universities to deliver a quality education in those courses.
  • Performance Analysis: With the data available about colleges and Universities, various metrics can be defined to measure the performances. Some of the metrics can be employment rate vs. passing graduation rate. This kind of analysis will help governing bodies to concentrate on specifically on those universities that have bad employment to passing graduates ratio.
2. Visibility into Fund Utilization by Universities

By enforcing Universities/Colleges to update the fund utilization status on a periodic (monthly/quarterly) basis the governing bodies can have a deeper visibility into the efficacy of funds. This would help the governing bodies to improve the utilization rate by monitoring on a regular basis and preventing hasty decisions by universities to utilize the fund before its expiry.

3. Single Point of Contact for Universities/Colleges

The system will gather all the pre-requisites from governing bodies and professional councils for funding/approval process. This information will be consolidated at a place to reduce the duplication of efforts. To illustrate, when a university applies for funds/approval or any other engagement with UGC (as example) then the entire necessary documents can submitted online by the university without any manual interaction. These documents will stay in the repository of the HESS so that if University has to interact with any other body like AICTE etc. then the university need not resubmit common information. The system will fetch the information from the repository for AICTE.

This will reduce submission of similar information by the Universities to different governing bodies. The data will be submitted by the University at a common place and will then be re-routed to various governing bodies as and when required.

4. Benchmarking against better performing colleges

It is really astonishing to see the gap between some of the top institutes (IITs, IIMs etc.) of India and the other institutes. The gap among these institutes needs to be reduced to raise the overall level of higher education in the country.

With HESS having consolidated information about all the colleges and Universities, benchmarking of lesser performing colleges can be done with the better performing colleges based on some common criteria like:
  • Efficacy of Fund Utilization: If two colleges with similar funding perform at different levels then the governing bodies can organize a knowledge sharing session between the two colleges.
  • Better Student Performances: If two colleges with same course offerings and similar faculty to student ratio have drastically different results then the best practices can be replicated from one college to another.
  • Course Modification: Based on feedback from the industry, the system (HESS) can identify intelligently which courses need to be modified. Subsequently, with the approval of authorities necessary changes can be made to the curriculum in a short time making our system dynamic and adaptable to change.
All this kind of analysis can be performed in a short time by using HESS.

5. Intelligent Feedback Mechanism

The voices of the end consumer of education i.e. students are rarely heard directly by the governing bodies. There are too many levels for the voice or opinion of a student to remain original before reaching the concerned authorities.

HESS can have an interface with the students to get the direct feedback on some critical matters like efficacy of course etc. The feedback then can be intelligently analyzed by the system to show the impact of suggested change on the key result areas (like Governance, Teaching, Evaluation etc) set by the governing bodies.

6. Industry Orientation and Improved Employment Rate

The yardstick to measure the quality of education in a country is either the contribution in Research & Development or the Employment rate. Assuming that every institute has a limited number of R & D aspirants, measuring the quality of education depends mainly on employment rate. Though governing bodies need not be responsible for creating job opportunities yet they can play a significant role in reducing the unemployment rate in lesser-known colleges by re-directing some of the job opportunities. This would be a great help for bright students in lesser-known colleges.

For creating such opportunities projects/jobs in various fields can be published in the system by industry/other colleges. These project requirements can then be internally communicated to select institutes based on some rules e.g. colleges with low employment rate but good academic results can be given preference.

This is not to say that governing bodies should act like placement agencies but like a body that will make sure that good universities or good candidates in remote areas don’t lose out on opportunity to change their lives. Assumption here is that the corporate houses and organizations would trust a governing body more than an individual university.

III. KEY BENEFITS

A. Single Window Approval/Clearance System

As discussed above, the HESS can provide a single window for approval/clearance for an institution. The documents/ details to be submitted need not be duplicated. A common repository would hold the documents from where the concerned governing body can fetch the information anytime.

B. Faster Approval and Funding Processes

HESS can reduce long cycle of accreditation and approval by automating most of the manual processes. This will not only help in better utilization rate but also encourage the universities to go for accreditation/approval on a regular basis.

C. Keeping a check on Fraudulent Colleges The integrated system can respond to any university/ college’s request to verify the status of a college. In case of transfer/admission/placement of a student to a university/ organization, his credentials can be verified on a real-time basis. This will prevent students from using fake degrees to get admission/job.

D. Improved Quality of Education

An integrated system like HESS can enable the authorities to analyze the performance of one of the best performing institute in related field and compare it with other colleges to identify the gap areas. Also, the system can obtain feedback from industry and students to modify course curriculum if deemed appropriate by the authorities. This will allow all the lesser performing colleges to reduce the gap with better performing institutes. It will be help in the betterment of the higher education in the country and increase the number of employable students.

E. Increased and Broadened Employment

The HESS can be used as an analytical tool to assess the performance of an institute based on employment rate vs. the number of passing graduates. This would enable the governing bodies to capture the reason behind the low employment rate in a college. The opportunities from corporate houses/colleges can then be broadly diverted to lesserknown colleges for some bright students.

IV. POSSIBLE ROADBLOCKS

The HESS can be a significant step in improving the governance and service levels in higher education but there can be some roadblocks in the success of this concept:

A. Furnishing Data by Universities/Colleges

The biggest roadblock in the success of this kind of system would be the availability of data with Universities/ Colleges. At the moment, this data would have to be uploaded on a monthly/quarterly basis manually in most cases.

The best-case scenario would be if these institutes/ universities have the required data maintained in their own systems. In such a scenario, the data can be fetched/requested at any moment for analysis and decision can be taken on real data and not past data.

B. Threat of Losing Control

One possible concern area for Universities/Colleges would be of losing control over the utilization of funds, innovation in teaching etc.

This threat would require to be attended to by the governing bodies. Actually, it is not a threat but an opportunity to gear up for possible competition from foreign universities in the long run by being transparent and more efficient.

C. Concern about Sharing Best Practices

Another area of concern especially for the better performing institutes can be that of sharing their practices through which they achieved better results.

This again needs to be addressed by the authorities by giving some incentives for sharing their practices in an open manner with lesser performing colleges.

V. CONCLUSION

Higher Education Service System (HESS) is a concept that can possibly revolutionize the governance in higher education. It has the capability of improving quality of higher education and increasing number of employable students.

Despite its great potential to help the higher education in India the success of this concept will be based on a great coordination and support from governing bodies and Universities, Colleges.

REFERENCES

[1] FICCI Survey on Understanding of Private Higher Education in India, 2006

[2] Higher Education Sector in India: Opportunities & Reforms (Foundation for Democratic Reforms / Lok Satta), Tulika Khemani & Jayaprakash Narayan, March 2006.

[3] Higher Education in Science and Research & Development: The Challenges and Road Ahead (INSA, New Delhi and Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore), August 2006

[4] Measuring Returns: Examining the Financial and Process Improvement Impact of Student Administration, Human Resources, and Finance Systems in Higher Education, White Paper by Eduventures, 2004

[5] Ministry of Education Website: http://www.education.nic.in

[6] National Accreditation and Assessment Council (NAAC) website, http://www.naac-india.com

Print   

Del.icio.us  Digg it  Reddit  Yahoo Bookmarks  Google Bookmarks
 
Read all the responses to our call for suggestions, recommendations and position papers on ‘Defining a Roadmap for Building a National ICT in School Education Policy’



CONSULTATIONS


Round Table Discussion on Capacity Building of Teachers and Schools in ICT
September 30, 2008, Hotel Claridges, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi

Second National level consultation on Building a policy for ICT in school education
Second Inter-Ministerial Meet, March 12, 2008, Hotel Claridges, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi

First National level consultation on Building a policy for ICT in school education
13th February, 2008, Grand Inter-Continental, New Delhi

UNESCO Solution Exchange: Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICTD) Community
Visioning Workshop 6th-7th, December 2007 at Auroville

Concept Note:
Building a stakeholder consultation process
(HTML)

International Conference on Universal Quality School Education (UQSE)
GeSCI Session: Towards a Policy on ICT in Education 23 November, 2007, Hotel Ashok, New Delhi

Second Consultation for Policy Focus on Digital Content
Manthan Awards, September 22nd, 2007, India Islamic Cultural Center, New Delhi

First Consultation for Policy Focus on Digital Content
December 19, 2007, NUEPA, New Delhi

First National Stakeholder Consultation Workshop
eINDIA2007, July 31st, Hotel Taj Palace, New Delhi

© 2008, CSDMS. All rights reserved.